Executive Cybersecurity Accountability: A Rising Trend?
The accountability for security failures or breaches typically falls on security teams or specific IT leaders rather than higher-level executives or the board. This accountability has long been the case; cyber risks were often siloed as technical issues rather than integrated into broader company business risk management frameworks. However, bucking this historical trend are recent moves from big companies like Microsoft toward more executive cybersecurity accountability.
Increased Executive Cybersecurity Accountability
As part of Microsoft’s Secure Future initiative, the company announced in May 2024 that it will base part of the compensation for the senior leadership team on progress in meeting security plans and milestones. This initiative aims to make security the top priority at Microsoft, above all else.
An interesting development in Europe mirrors this trend and takes it a step further. The European Union’s NIS 2 Directive, which comes into force in October 2024, also shifts toward increased executive cybersecurity accountability. The difference here is that the EU’s regulatory powers will mean organizational management and executives can be found personally liable for gross negligence that results in serious cyber incidents. Punitive measures include temporary bans from similar positions or monetary fines.
What’s the Reason for the Shift?
It’s most likely the combination of several factors influencing this shift in accountability toward those at the highest levels of companies. One is that modern cyber threats regularly come with drastic financial and reputational consequences, so they are no longer seen as just an IT issue. Rather, they’re a strategic business challenge to deal with at the highest echelons of company hierarchies.
Aside from regulations like NIS 2 that directly put senior positions in the cybersecurity spotlight, there are also increased general regulatory pressures to contend with. GDPR in the EU, CCPA in California and others globally impose hefty fines and sanctions for non-compliance, which pushes cybersecurity up to the boardroom agenda.
On a related point, investors, customers and partners now have heightened expectations for how companies manage data privacy and security. Companies that fail to protect data can suffer from lost business and diminished trust. That’s why security increasingly needs to be seen as something that those in executive-level positions take more oversight and responsibility for.
What Might This Mean?
The trend toward increased executive accountability in cybersecurity is changing not only who is responsible for cyber risk management but also how companies approach their security programs. This shift has the potential to transform security practices.
- Strategic alignment of security with business goals: When executives are more involved in cybersecurity, security strategies are more likely to align with your wider business objectives. This could lead to prioritizing investments in security technologies and practices that protect against key threats to your most important assets.
- Increased budget allocation: With executives directly accountable for cybersecurity, there’s a clearer pathway for CISOs and IT security teams to secure necessary funding. Executives who understand the stakes involved and the consequences of not taking things seriously are more likely to approve budgets reflecting robust cybersecurity’s true cost.
- Proactive security posture: Executive involvement can shift cybersecurity from reactive to proactive. With more resources and strategic planning, security teams can focus on advanced threat detection/response and ongoing security training programs that help prevent more serious breaches.
- Better crisis management: Executive oversight and accountability can lead to better preparation and more structured crisis management. The ability to make quick and correct decisions at the highest levels often makes a big difference in mitigating the worst damage during a cyber incident.
- Cultural shift toward security awareness: When leadership bears the consequences of cybersecurity shortfalls, it can foster a drive toward a wider culture of security awareness. This cultural shift helps reduce the chance of human error, which remains a leading cause of security incidents.
Learn how to communicate cybersecurity risks to your board effectively. Download our free eBook now!
Aside from these upsides to increased executive cybersecurity accountability, there are also some challenges to consider. For one, the effectiveness of this shift largely depends on how well executives understand cybersecurity issues. Without proper knowledge and commitment, executive involvement might not translate into better security. In fact, NIS 2 recognizes this challenge by mandating that executives take sufficient training to “gain sufficient knowledge and skills to identify risks and assess cybersecurity risk management practices and their impact on the services provided.”
There’s also the risk of leaning too far toward security to the detriment of other crucial business aims and initiatives. Security obviously needs to be a higher priority worldwide, but it should slot in alongside other business priorities like innovation rather than replace them. Thoughtful engagement, informed decision-making, and a balanced approach to managing cybersecurity as a component of overall business strategy are essential here.
Increased executive accountability has the potential to reshape cybersecurity programs in several positive ways; however, navigating these waters requires not only commitment but also deep expertise. Nuspire offers a comprehensive range of cybersecurity consulting services designed to align your security strategy with your business objectives. We customize our approach for your industry. Learn more here.
Learn how to communicate cybersecurity risks to your board effectively.
